Review Processes

1. Editorial Reviews and Updates: Faculty Senate representative and Office of the Provost representative complete annual review. 
2. Review and Changes for Academic Policies and Procedures (completed as needed)

   Faculty Committees, Academic Cabinet, or Office of the Provost propose changes	→	Faculty Senate review: approval or review	→	Provost: final approval or more review
   Faculty Senate	→	Academic Cabinet	→	Provost

   Faculty Senate representatives have the opportunity to gather feedback from the senate before decisions are made. Proposals that affect the Faculty Handbook will be on the Academic Cabinet agenda for no less than two months, with decisions happening no sooner than the second month. Faculty senate representatives will have the responsibility to get feedback in the interim month. 
3. Review and Changes for Personnel Policies (completed as needed)

   Faculty Committees, Faculty Senate, or Office of the Provost propose changes

   →

   Faculty Senate review

   →

   Provost: approval or review

   →

   Academic Cabinet, President, or Board approval as needed

   Faculty Senate representatives have the opportunity to gather feedback from the senate before decisions are made. Proposals that affect the Faculty Handbook will be on the Academic Cabinet agenda for no less than two months, with decisions happening no sooner than the second month. Faculty senate representatives will have the responsibility to get feedback in the interim month.